Fanack Home / Palestine / Past to Present / Palestinian leadership

Palestinian leadership

Arafat Palestinian Leadership
PLO leader Yasser Arafat at the UN in New York in November 1974

Two years after the Arab defeat in the June War, Palestinian resistance organizations succeeded in taking over control of the PLO from within. Until then, the PLO had been an instrument in the hands of the Arab states. As leader of the largest organization (Fatah, nationalist), Yasser Arafat became the new chairman. Other groups belonging to the PLO were the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP; Leftist), the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP; Leftist), the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC; Syrian aided nationalist movement) and al-Saiqa (founded by Syria). The Communist Party of Palestine, a close-knit organization, remained outside the PLO, as it was from day one (and in line with Moscow) an advocate of a two-state solution: a Palestinian state in Palestine alongside Israel. At the time, this viewpoint went against the PLO, which advocated the establishment of one secular state in the whole of Palestine, in which Jews, Muslims, and Christians would live side by side on the basis of equality and equal rights. This aim was to be realized through armed conflict. Although the leadership and most guerrillas were not accommodated in Palestine, Fatah, the PFLP and the DFLP each had grassroots support in Palestine.

Upon taking the territory, Israel established a military government, headed by a military governor, who worked on the basis of military orders. These regulations were not restricted to ‘maintaining order’, but penetrated deeply into the lives of the Palestinians (issuing of permits, access to land, water management, and so forth). Between 1967 and 1994, about two thousand orders were issued.

The Palestinian reaction

As was to be expected, the Palestinians did not submit to the occupation. An attempt to unleash a guerrilla war against the Israeli occupation force failed. Nevertheless, Israel did not manage to bring the Gaza Strip under control until the end of 1971. It did so by using large-scale violence causing many deaths. To control the area, whole streets were bulldozed, straight across the densely populated, compactly built refugee camps. Thousands of refugees were left homeless. Numerous family members of wanted persons were also imprisoned.

Afterwards, resistance took on the form of strikes organized by shopkeepers, school pupils and lawyers, and appeals and petitions by notables and prominent political figures against the occupation. Israel, in turn, countered these challenges to its power by imposing curfews, arrests, large fines, and deportations (between 1967 and 1994, two thousand prominent politicians, businessmen, scientists and journalists were exiled to neighbouring countries). Israel used the Defence Emergency Regulations (established by the British in 1945) to justify these and other measures – such as blowing up the homes of guerrillas.

Further Reading

Palestine is made up of two geographically separate areas: the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Together, they make up 22 p...
Palestinians have been waging a bitter struggle to establish their independent state and implement international legitim...
In August 1973, after the Palestinians in Palestine had somewhat recovered from the shock of 1967 and the ensuing events...

We would like to ask you something …

Fanack is an independent media organisation, not funded by any state or any interest group, that distributes in the Middle East and the wider world unbiased analysis and background information, based on facts, about the Middle East and North Africa.

The website grew rapidly in breadth and depth and today forms a rich and valuable source of information on 21 countries, from Morocco to Oman and from Iran to Yemen, both in Arabic and English. We currently reach six million readers annually and growing fast.

In order to guarantee the impartiality of information on the Chronicle, articles are published without by-lines. This also allows correspondents to write more freely about sensitive or controversial issues in their country. All articles are fact-checked before publication to ensure that content is accurate, current and unbiased.

To run such a website is very expensive. With a small donation, you can make a huge impact. And it only takes a minute. Thank you.