The sheikhs traditionally allowed foreign powers some domestic influence in exchange for military protection and personal prestige. Thus Jassim bin Mohammed welcomed an Ottoman garrison in Doha in 1872 and became their official representative afterwards. The British were rewarded with the 1916 Treaty – which brought Qatar solidly within the British sphere of influence – after their intervention in the succession crisis of 1913. When the British finally left in 1971, the acting ruler Khalifa bin Hamad had no choice but to turn to Saudi Arabia to guarantee the safety of his young nation. When Hamad bin Khalifa deposed his father in 1995, he tried to free Qatar from Saudi-Wahhabi influence by turning to the United States instead. All these alliances and treaties with more powerful nations have shaped the policies of the ruler to a certain degree.
Former emir Hamad bin Khalifa’s internal politics were characterized by promises of democratization. In 2003, a new constitution was approved in a national referendum. According to this document, the Advisory Council will be replaced by a parliament. Two-thirds of its members will be elected directly by the people. The emir, who continues to appoint his own ministers, will choose the remaining candidates. Freedom of association, expression, and religious affiliation are guaranteed, although political parties remain illegal. However, implementation of the most promising articles of the constitution has been extremely hesitant. Parliamentary elections were announced for 2004, but they have still not taken place, presumably because of continuing opposition within the ruling family. As of July 2013, after Hamad’s smooth handover of power to his son Tamim, no elections had been held.
Irrespective of domestic reasons for the present standstill in Qatar’s programme of political reform, it is clear that the US is no longer pressing the Gulf regimes for greater public participation in politics. After the American led invasion of Iraq, the US administration is all the more dependent on the friendship of Gulf states. The geopolitical threat – and competition – from Iran is an added reason for keeping relations with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations free from ideological or humanitarian concerns.
We would like to ask you something …
Fanack is an independent media organisation, not funded by any state or any interest group, that distributes in the Middle East and the wider world unbiased analysis and background information, based on facts, about the Middle East and North Africa.
The website grew rapidly in breadth and depth and today forms a rich and valuable source of information on 21 countries, from Morocco to Oman and from Iran to Yemen, both in Arabic and English. We currently reach six million readers annually and growing fast.
In order to guarantee the impartiality of information on the Chronicle, articles are published without by-lines. This also allows correspondents to write more freely about sensitive or controversial issues in their country. All articles are fact-checked before publication to ensure that content is accurate, current and unbiased.