You may also like
The concept of human rights has become a well-known and widely accepted term to use. Varying interpretations are possible, with differences usually being based on cultural background. Nonetheless, most of these understandings consciously or subconsciously include the basic rights outlined in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The United Nations General Assembly (GA) adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on December 10th, 1948. It was written in the aftermath of World War II, “… as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind…” Thus it was truly meant to be universal, to protect citizens from any type of violation the world had recently experienced, as outlined in the Preamble and 30 Articles.
As such, it includes articles on the right to life in dignity; liberty and security; freedom of movement; right to nationality and education; just treatment of human beings and respect; as well as freedom of expressions and opinions, from torture or inhumane treatment, as well as economic, social and cultural rights.
International Human Rights Law
The Declaration is not legally binding, but is the basis of international human rights law. Two binding UN covenants were formed as a result of the UDHR; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Combined, these three documents are often referred to as the “International Bill of Human Rights”.
Over the years other conventions have been written to expand on and add to this fundament, focusing on a variety of topics such as refugees (1951 and 1967), discrimination of women (‘CEDAW’, 1979) and disabled persons (2008), against torture (1987), protection of migrant workers (1990), and against racial discrimination (1969) to name a few.
Additionally, the International Labour Organization has compiled a large number of conventions specifically related to work force and labour standards, of which 8 are considered ‘fundamental conventions’ and relate to freedom of association (1948, C087), collective bargaining (1949, C098), forced labour (1930, C029 and 1957, C105), minimum age (1973, C138), child labour (1999, C182), equal remuneration (1951, C100), equal opportunity and treatment (C111).
The Geneva Conventions are a revision of previously constructed conventions, adjusted after WWII and specifically focus on treatment of persons in time of war. It consists of four Conventions, and three additional protocols. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) explains that the Conventions “aims at ensuring that, even in the midst of hostilities, the dignity of the human person, universally acknowledged in principle, shall be respected.”
During a series of expert meetings, congregations by Red Cross agencies, and a confluence of government representatives over time, the articles were revised until a draft was represented at The Diplomatic Conference for the Establishment of International Conventions for the Protection of Victims of War in 1949. The Final Act was signed by fifty-nine nations, some of which no longer exist, and has attained more signatories since.
The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) was compiled by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in 1990, during the 19th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers in Cairo, and has 57 signatories. This Declaration holds similar – if not identical – principles as the UDHR, but notably also included articles related to ‘jus in bello’ – acceptable wartime conduct, alike the Geneva Conventions. The CDHRI also addresses equality between women and men, rights of the child, freedom, right to medical care, right to self-determination, amongst others. Most notably is that this 25 Article document clearly lists the Sharia as reference point including for punishment. The CDHRI has been adopted by 45 countries, out of the total 57 members of the OIC.
Conventions Signed By Lebanon
Lebanon signed the Conventions on 10 April 1951, Additional Protocol I (Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts) and Additional Protocol II (Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts) on 23 July 1997. Moreover, Lebanon became signatory to the Convention for the Rights of the Child (CRC) on 14 May 1991.
Lebanon voted in favor of the UDHR, unsurprisingly since the Lebanese Dr. Charles Malik helped draft the document.
Lebanon has been member of the OIC since 1969, and has only left one of the 8 fundamental ILO conventions not ratified by Lebanon, being the convention on freedom of association (C087).
The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees is based off Article 14 of the UDHR, and recognizes the right of asylum and protection of refugees. It was approved during the General Assembly meeting of December 14, 1950 and came into force on April 22, 1954. However, the original Convention limited its scope to refugees fleeing prior to 1 January 1951. As such, an additional protocol was compiled in 1967, removing these limitations.
Lebanon is not party to the 1951 Convention nor its Protocol.
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women – also called CEDAW, was approved during the General Assembly Session on 18 December, 1979 and entered into force on 3 September 1981. Lebanon confirmed its accession on April 16, 1997. Through “accession” a state accepts the offer or the opportunity to become a party to a treaty, which has already negotiated and signed by other states. It has the same legal effect as ratification. Countries that have ratified or acceded CEDAW are legally bound to put its provisions into practice, and thereby agree to submit national reports on measures taken to comply with its obligations. Such reports are to be compiled at least every four years.
Lebanon made reservations against Article 9 (2), concerning children’s nationality; and Article 16 paragraph (1c), prescribing equal rights and responsibilities during marriage and its dissolution; Article 16 (1d), listing same rights and responsibilities in marriage pertaining children; 16 (1f) granting equal rights and responsibilities regarding guardianship, wardship, trusteeship, and adoption of children if this exists in national legislation; and 16 (1g) granting the same personal rights to husband and wife including the right to choose a family name. Additionally, Lebanon does not consider itself bound to Article 29 (1), discussing dispute between states concerning interpretation or application of the Convention. It is noteworthy that Article 29 (2) specifically allows for such a reservation.
Persons with Disabilities
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was approved during the General Assembly session on December 13, 2006 and came into force on May 3, 2008. Simultaneously, the Optional Protocol was approved, giving the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) competence to examine individual complaints with regard to alleged violations by States parties to the Protocol. The CRPD is the body of independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention. Lebanon signed the Convention on June 14, 2007, alongside the Optional Protocol.
The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, also referred to as just the Convention against Torture, was adopted during the General Assembly session on December 10, 1984. On June 26, 1987 it was registered and thereby came into force. Its implementation is monitored by the Committee Against Torture (CAT), composed of ten individuals of various nationalities. All signatory states are obliged to send regular reports to the CAT, based on which recommendations are made. Lebanon acceded to the Convention on October 5, 2000 with no reservations.
The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families was approved by the General Assembly on December 18, 1990 and entered into force on July 1, 2003. Lebanon is not party to the Convention.
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination was approved by the General Assembly and accordingly opened for signature on March 7, 1966. It entered into force on January 4, 1969. Despite the obvious as stated in the Convention title, it aims to obliterate hate speech and promote understanding. Implementation of the articles is monitored by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, to which bi-annual reports are submitted by each signatory. It also is responsible for handling inter-state and individual complaints related to non-conformity to the provisions of the Convention, as prescribed in Article 14.
Lebanon acceded to the Convention on November 12, 1971. AS reservation, it listed that it does not consider itself bound to the provisions of Article 22, pertaining to inter-state dispute resulting from interpretation or implementation of the Convention, stating that all parties to the dispute are to expressly consent to intervention of the International Court of Justice.
Article 13 of the Constitution states that the freedom to express one’s thoughts in writing or by speaking is guaranteed ‘within the limits fixed by law’, as are press freedom, freedom of meeting and freedom of association.
Two factors limit press freedom. The first is that politics and media are very closely tied and that most prominent politicians have their own press. The second, much worse, is the violence which journalists may encounter. 2005 was a particularly bad year, with the murders of Gebran Tueni and Samir Kassir, both from the newspaper al-Nahar founded by Gebran Tueni’s grandfather, who was murdered himself. That same year witnessed the attempted murder of May Chidiac, the very popular anchor woman of the Lebanese Broadcast Corperation (LBC). She was not killed, but she lost an arm and a leg.
In the 2010 ranking of Reporters without Borders (RSF) Lebanon came out 78th out of 178, Freedom House ranked it 115th out of 196, the only one ‘partly free’ in the region, except for Israel, all others being ‘not free’ in Freedom House’s chart. ‘The country’s deep political polarization is mirrored by Lebanon’s media,’ writes RSF. ‘Although the Lebanese press continues to enjoy a freedom of expression virtually unrivalled in the region, it has been undermined by political tensions. There was a further racking up of pressure in the run-up to the June 2009 poll. Though less common than in the years before, there were still physical assaults against journalists, often as a result of political tension.’
Both organizations stress that the Lebanese government does not try to censure the Internet, except for an incident in which four university students were jailed for a week without trial on charges of slander, libel, and public insult due to comments posted on the social networking site Facebook.
Broadcasting on the Internet is becoming more and more popular. As the government has to approve broadcasting licenses, broadcasting on internet or by satellite has become an escape route for those who were not granted a license, for whatever reason.
Below are the publications by acclaimed journalists and academics concerning the Human Rights of Lebanon section of this country file:
Below are the latest articles by acclaimed journalists and academics concerning the topic ‘Human Rights’ and ‘Lebanon’. These articles are posted in this country file or elsewhere on our website: